...because the merged changes had been pushed to insert queue and
inserted after drop_journal!!

Daniel Kahn Gillmor authored 8 years ago and Daniel Salzman committed 8 years ago

At NDSS 2017's DNS privacy workshop, I presented an empirical study of
DNS padding policies:

https://www.internetsociety.org/events/ndss-symposium/ndss-symposium-2017/dns-privacy-workshop-2017-programme#session3

The slide deck is here:
https://dns.cmrg.net/ndss2017-dprive-empirical-DNS-traffic-size.pdf

The resulting recommendation from the research is that a simple
padding policy is relatively cheap and still protective of metadata
when DNS traffic is encrypted:

 * queries should be padded to a multiple of 128 octets
 * responses should be padded to a multiple of 468 octets

Since future research could propose even better policies, and future
DNS traffic characteristics might evolve, I've implemented this
recommendation as a new function in libknot:
knot_edns_default_padding_size()

This changeset also modifies kdig to use this padding policy by
default when doing queries over TLS, and defines +padding (with no
argument) as a kdig option that forces the use of the default padding
policy.

With this changeset, any libknot user who wants to use "a sensible DNS
padding policy" can just rely on the library; this means that if a
better padding policy is determined in the future, it can be
distributed to all users by upgrading libknot.

Libor Peltan authored 8 years ago and Daniel Salzman committed 8 years ago

instead of hard-changing msgID in packet wire, which breaks msgID for the response, we just
set the original msgID when computing the tsig hash to check against

Libor Peltan authored 8 years ago and Daniel Salzman committed 8 years ago

...to display either real Knot running version, numbers of workers, or configure options

Libor Peltan authored 8 years ago and Daniel Salzman committed 8 years ago

Previously, the too-long-check for synthetized cname was only regarding
number of labels, but not overall length.