distro/deb: don't explictly link agains libjemalloc
It seems that new versions of jemalloc (5.2) behave much worse than standard libc malloc. The memory consumption only grows after huge AXFRs.
Please register or sign in to comment
Self sign-up has been disabled due to increased spam activity. If you want to get access, please send an email to a project owner (preferred) or at gitlab(at)nic(dot)cz. We apologize for the inconvenience.
It seems that new versions of jemalloc (5.2) behave much worse than standard libc malloc. The memory consumption only grows after huge AXFRs.