Tests extra updates
- May 29, 2020
-
-
David Vasek authored
Also, fix an unrelated comment.
-
David Vasek authored
By allowing the test to send more requests under Valgrind, there is a better statistical chance for obtaining more accurate test results and avoiding false test failure (it should prevent false RRL ERRORs). Under Valgrind, it is also safer to provide the server more time to respond (it should prevent false RRL STATS ERRORs).
-
David Vasek authored
-
David Vasek authored
zone_backup() can be done synchronously as a result of a recent update to the flush() function (flush() in zone_backup() is always called in blocking/synchronous mode).
-
David Vasek authored
The blocking option ("wait") of ctl() could be used instead of the first wait_for_dnskey_count() call. Not using it, keeping the original test style.
-
David Vasek authored
-
David Vasek authored
-
David Vasek authored
Also, convert both Bind and Knot flush()'s to use this new functionality.
-
David Vasek authored
-
David Vasek authored
Complete apex NS RRSet removals (ANY NS removals) aren't processed by the server (see RFC 2136, Section 7.13). If such a removal (or removals) is the only change in the update, then it's a no-change DDNS update to the zone, which usually breaks the test. Therefore, generate such removals, but don't count them as changes.
-
- May 28, 2020
-
-
David Vasek authored
-
David Vasek authored
... not breaking it on slow CPU's (or with Valgrind) at the same time.
-
David Vasek authored
-