DDNS + DNSSEC
Merge request reports
Activity
@jvcelak Please do not make any more big changes in 'review-dnssec' branch until this merge request is passed, there are a lot of conflicts. And please review changes in DNSSEC related stuff as well.
934 if (fixed_nsec == NULL) { 935 return KNOT_ENOMEM; 936 } 937 938 // Add new NSEC RR to changeset 939 return knot_changeset_add_rrset(out_ch, fixed_nsec, KNOT_CHANGESET_ADD); 940 } 941 942 int fix_nsec3_chain_for(const knot_node_t *node, 943 const knot_node_t *to, uint32_t ttl, 944 knot_changeset_t *out_ch, 945 const knot_zone_contents_t *zone) 946 { 947 //TODO implement, might not be so easy without nice way to get next nodes 948 } 949 27 30 #include "libknot/dnssec/key.h" 28 31 #include "libknot/dnssec/policy.h" 29 #include "libknot/dnssec/rrset-sign.h" 30 32 #include "libknot/dnssec/sign.h" 33 #include "libknot/dnssec/rrset-sign.h" 31 34 #include "libknot/dnssec/zone-keys.h" 32 #include "libknot/rdata.h" 35 #include "libknot/rrset.h" 33 36 #include "libknot/updates/changesets.h" 34 #include "libknot/util/debug.h" 35 37 #include "libknot/zone/node.h" 36 38 #include "libknot/zone/zone-contents.h" 39 #include "libknot/util/debug.h" 37 40 38 /*- private API - common functions -------------------------------------------*/ 41 //! \todo Check if defined elsewhere.
Please register or sign in to reply